BRONSON KAAHUI State Senate District 6, West Maui, Maalaea & N Kihei on 7 23 14 interview with Jason Schwartz
Summary & Transcript
In this candid interview, Bronson Kaahui, a candidate for State Senate District 6 in Hawaii, shares his unconventional political views and motivations for running. Kaahui emphasizes cutting through political rhetoric to focus on substantive issues, particularly criticizing government overreach and the misinformation surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs). He details his journey from being anti-GMO due to personal concerns during his wife’s pregnancy to conducting independent research that led him to conclude that GMOs are scientifically safe and that much of the anti-GMO movement is driven by misinformation and financial interests. He also discusses other key issues such as marijuana legalization, government restrictions on building hospitals and homes, the Jones Act’s economic impact, and bureaucratic hurdles exacerbating homelessness in Maui. Kaahui advocates for reducing government interference in people’s lives, promoting personal liberty, and encouraging voters to critically research issues themselves rather than blindly following popular narratives. He concludes by urging voters to recognize government as a source of many societal problems, particularly corporatism, and to seek truth beyond biases and emotional attachments.
Highlights
-
[00:12] ? Introduction of Bronson Kaahui, candidate for State Senate District 6 in Hawaii.
-
[02:24] ? Kaahui describes how censorship in the anti-GMO community sparked his skepticism and research.
-
[04:54] ? Debunking the infamous Dr. Seralini GMO tumor study as fraudulent and unethical.
-
[08:17] ? Clarification that organic farming does use pesticides, sometimes more harmful than synthetic ones.
-
[15:01] ? Arguing for marijuana legalization and opposing “certificate of need” laws restricting hospital construction.
-
[18:54] ? Highlighting how zoning laws and bureaucracy worsen the housing crisis and homelessness in Maui.
-
[33:58] ? Bronson’s self-described journey as a “truth seeker” who overcame cognitive bias to find evidence-based conclusions.
Key Insights
-
[01:01] ?ﾸﾏ Cutting through political rhetoric: Kaahui’s frustration with politicians repeating empty slogans reflects a broader public disillusionment with political discourse. His approach to focus on “substance over spin” underscores the need for more transparent, issue-oriented political communication. This mindset is crucial for voter engagement and trust-building in any democratic process.
-
[02:24] ? Censorship as a catalyst for critical thinking: The anti-GMO community’s intolerance for dissent pushed Kaahui to question narratives and do independent research. This illustrates how attempts to silence opposing views can backfire, fostering deeper skepticism and investigation. It highlights the importance of open discourse and transparency in public debates, especially on controversial topics like GMOs.
-
[04:54] ? Scientific rigor and misinformation: The Seralini affair exemplifies how flawed studies can mislead public opinion. Kaahui’s explanation reveals how scientific misconduct—such as using tumor-prone rats, unethical animal treatment, and suppressing peer review—can be exploited to fuel fear. This insight stresses the need for critical evaluation of scientific claims and the peer review process as a safeguard against misinformation.
-
[08:17] ? Misconceptions around organic farming: Many people assume organic means pesticide-free, but Kaahui clarifies that organic farming often uses pesticides and herbicides, some potentially more harmful than synthetic ones like glyphosate. This challenges popular beliefs and calls for a more nuanced understanding of agricultural practices, food safety, and labeling policies.
-
[15:01] ⚖️ Regulatory barriers hinder innovation and access: Kaahui’s opposition to “certificate of need” laws for hospitals and his critique of zoning restrictions on affordable housing illustrate how government regulations can block practical solutions, such regulation barriers hinder, reduced government intervention, gas mobile homes and hempcrete 3D-printed houses. This insight reveals the tension between regulation intended to protect and its unintended consequences that limit economic opportunity and exacerbate social issues like homelessness.
-
[17:09] ? Economic impacts of the Jones Act: The Jones Act’s requirement for U.S.-built and crewed ships significantly raises shipping costs in Hawaii, increasing the cost of living by at least a third. Kaahui connects this to protectionism benefiting unions and corporations at the expense of consumers, highlighting the complex interplay between government policy, economic cost, and labor interests.
-
[32:45] ? Freedom through reduced government intervention: Kaahui’s overarching philosophy is that government is often the root cause of societal problems, including corporatism and wealth inequality. He urges voters to challenge their cognitive biases, research independently, and understand that freedom comes from limiting government’s role. This libertarian-leaning perspective emphasizes personal responsibility and skepticism toward centralized power, resonating with voters who feel disenfranchised by traditional political structures.
Extended Analysis
Bronson Kaahui’s interview provides a compelling case study of how personal experience, emotional investment, and subsequent critical inquiry shape political views. His journey from anti-GMO activist to pro-GMO advocate reveals the power—and rarity—of changing one’s mind based on evidence, a quality often lacking in polarized political discourse. Kaahui’s critique of the anti-GMO movement’s censorship and misinformation tactics underscores the importance of intellectual humility and open dialogue in contentious public debates.
His detailed deconstruction of the Seralini study and the questionable credentials of some anti-GMO advocates highlights the necessity of scientific literacy among the electorate. Kaahui’s point about the organic industry’s financial interests in maintaining anti-GMO sentiments exposes the financial and ideological incentives that can distort public debates about food safety and agriculture policy.
Beyond GMOs, Kaahui’s positions on marijuana legalization, hospital construction laws, zoning restrictions, and the Jones Act reveal a consistent theme: government intervention often produces perverse outcomes that harm the very people it purports to protect. His call to dismantle bureaucratic barriers to housing and business development aligns with a growing movement advocating deregulation as a tool for addressing economic inequality and social challenges.
Kaahui’s libertarian stance on government being the primary obstacle to liberty and progress situates him outside traditional political frameworks, appealing to voters frustrated with entrenched power structures and ineffective policies. His references to wealth inequality under Obama, corporatism, and government subsidies for corporations articulate a critique that transcends party lines, focusing on systemic issues rather than partisan politics.
Finally, his emphasis on voters educating themselves and questioning dominant narratives is a timely reminder in the age of misinformation and social media echo chambers. Kaahui’s “red pill” metaphor and self-identification as a truth seeker encourage a mindset of skepticism, inquiry, and evidence-based decision making—qualities essential for meaningful democratic participation.
Conclusion
Bronson Kaahui’s interview offers valuable insights into the intersections of science, politics, and public policy through the lens of an independent-minded candidate. His critique of misinformation, government overreach, and corporatism, combined with his advocacy for personal liberty and critical thinking, provide a thought-provoking perspective on pressing local and national issues. Voters and policymakers alike can benefit from his call to prioritize evidence over emotion and to reconsider the role of government in shaping society’s future.
Highlights
-
[00:12] ? Introduction of Bronson Kaahui, candidate for State Senate District 6 in Hawaii.
-
[02:24] ? Censorship in anti-GMO groups sparked Kaahui’s independent research and skepticism.
-
[04:54] ? The fraudulent Seralini study debunked as unethical and scientifically invalid.
-
[08:17] ? Organic farming often uses pesticides, challenging common public assumptions.
-
[15:01] ? Support for marijuana legalization and opposition to restrictive hospital licensing laws.
-
[18:54] ? Bureaucratic zoning and permitting worsen Maui’s housing shortage and homelessness crisis.
-
[33:58] ? Kaahui’s personal “red pill” moment: overcoming bias to embrace evidence-based beliefs.
Key Insights
-
[01:01] ?ﾸﾏ Political rhetoric often lacks substance; transparency and issue-focus are vital for public trust.
-
[02:24] ? Censorship can backfire, fostering skepticism and deeper inquiry among the public.
-
[04:54] ? Scientific misconduct can mislead public opinion; peer review is critical to validate claims.
-
[08:17] ? Misconceptions about organic farming reveal the complexity of agricultural practices and safety.
-
[15:01] ⚖️ Regulatory barriers often hinder innovation and worsen social problems like homelessness.
-
[17:09] ? Protectionist laws like the Jones Act increase living costs, benefiting specific economic interests.
-
[32:45] ? Reducing government intervention is key to enhancing personal freedoms and addressing systemic inequality.
00:12
Aloha you probably know me I’m Jason Schwartz do you know Bronson Kaahui. Bronson is first of all Welcome to our show hey what’s up Bronson is running for State Senate District Six which is Kiheiand West Maui right about yeah Malaalaea in the middle too yeah okay the whole the strip guess the whole strip um and uh what made you decide to run well uh my main thing is that I was like you one day I see all the politicians yapping and uh they have a lot of words but never anything of substance they like to repeat slow Lans
01:01
often and you know they they basically take advantage of the Public’s ignorance so my job is to help you navigate through all the and get straight down to the issues and that’s exactly what I intend to do well then take two we had our phone ring in the middle we were just at the right point which is let’s talk about issues sure do you have any pet issue you want to start with or you want me to just pick them out of a hat either way okay um agriculture you have any feelings about this initiative this GMO thing yeah I do
01:48
um I have been buying organic for the last 6 years since my wife got pregnant and I’ve been active in the anti-gmo movement for about 3 years and and what I guess what kind of really transformed my view was uh the way that Shaka and Babes Against Biotech they really don’t tolerate descent and I uh I I started to ask questions and they would start censoring my posts on Facebook they’d be like oh well we can’t have people rating about would be Babes Against Biotech like I would either ask
02:24
a question or you know post an article that that said something that contradicted the party line and it would be immediately deleted and now they’ve got it to the point where I’m not allowed to comment at all and so that you know that for me someone like me like that only makes me more suspicious like if you’re censoring someone that’s a red flag to me you know that makes me want to do more research and start asking more questions so that’s what I did and come to find out I’ve been wrong
02:55
this whole time the science on GMOs is pretty clear there’s basically no difference between a GMO tomato and an organic tomato none at all according to science well I not sure how that can be even so but well a a GMO means that they’ve genetic they’ve modified the genes on a tomato you’re saying that this tomato looks like this tomato no no what I’m saying is that evolution is a constantly occurring process so there’s no such thing as uh a tomato not changing its jeans you know every time
03:39
you reproduce the genes are changing so so now so then let’s humans have been modifying take an interesting different step which means so you’re saying that genetically modifying everything is genetically modifying all the time yeah and so this is I think what they’re saying is if you’re consciously modifying the genetics mhm the group that is saying vote Yes says we would like you to prove that it’s safe before you start growing it and feeding it to us well like I said there’s been thousands of studies done
04:19
on the issue and there is a scientific consensus now of course you have there are uh there are Fringe scientists out there in groups who say oh no you know they’re the GMOs are dangerous for your health they cause cancer and tumors uh Dr seralini is one of the most obvious examples but you can go right now on your computer and Google the seralini affair Dr seralini is a known Quack and a known fraud he completely abandoned the scientific method when he did his study and he was immediately called out
04:54
the journal that published his study retracted it because he was first of all in his experiment he used a strain of rats that is known to get tumors in the wild up to 80% like just normally so he fed them GMO corn and non- GMO corn guess what the non-GMO corn rats also got tumors on top of that he kept the rats alive longer than his you know ethic ethical from a scientific perspective you’re supposed to euthanize after a certain point when no more information can be gathered from this he kept him alive for the sole purpose of
05:35
having the tumor grow Beyond its normal portion so that they could take pictures and post it to social media that’s an unethical treatment of animals first of all secondly why are you using a strain of rats that is known to get tumors in the wild it doesn’t make any sense at all and then on the the final thing he did is he had journalists sign a non-disclosure agreement which is basically censorship he said don’t share this information with other scientists or other researchers because we don’t
06:07
want them to know about it that is completely contradictory to to the scientific method and the peer rreview process other people have to see your work and replicate it and if they come to the same conclusion then that means it’s valid if not it’s probably bunk science and so what happened is people replicated his experiment and found out that he basically fabricated the whole thing Google the Sania Affair go see see it for yourself I guess I’m going to be Googling myself yeah so and then you can
06:41
go to the Shaka website right now and uh you go you go click on GMO facts and it says you know the the first organization that they they site is the American Association of environmental medicine sounds legit right so then I go and Google that I’m like who who is this American Association of environmental medicine turns out they’re a quack organization they you know they’re against vaccines for example they are not what do you mean by a quack organization they’re not recognized by
07:14
any scientific or medical uh organization they made their own certifying board because nobody would certify them you know it’s not real science it’s like uh you have scientists who who say that evolution is not right or that the Earth is less than 10,000 years old I mean you have real scientists who really believe this I mean you have scientists who don’t think the Earth is warming or or don’t think that man has caused it just because you have scientists who who believe something it doesn’t contradict the
07:47
mountains and mountains and mountains of evidence in favor of the consensus right so I’m going to break in only because that isn’t even an issue you’re going to if you were in that state house you would be voting on that kind of thing you would so that was an issue that you were wanted to exp well let let’s go to the labeling law then since science tells us that there’s essentially no difference between a GMO tomato and an organic tomato then the well first of all organic doesn’t mean
08:17
what you think it means because organic doesn’t mean pesticide and herbicide free that’s a huge misconception that a lot of people have organic uh most 99% of all organic food is grown with both pesticides and herbicides and many times these pesticides and herbicides are more dangerous than synthetic Alternatives like Roundup Roundup was made specifically to uh stop using atrazine which is what they were using before now it’s glyphosate glyphosate is safer than atrazine and a lot of other uh organic
08:50
or natural pesticides that you probably never heard of what they do I’ve seen glyphosate glyphosate mhm something like that yeah uh has ISS issues yeah it definitely does have issues but what are we comparing it to if we if they had a mandatory pesticide labeling I’d agree with that but then that would be basically all food you know 99% of all food uses pesticides and herbicides so yeah we could do that but guess who would fight that the organic Consumers Union probably shakka too you know they don’t
09:25
want you to label pesticides they want to scare you into thinking GMOs cause cancer or tumors I would say that and I don’t think anyone would want to uh the pesticide thing I think no one would want that Shaka guys too you think that Shaka would be in support of mandatory pesticide labeling let’s push it let’s work together on this is I’m saying well mandatory pesticide labeling like you said that means almost all the produce out there exactly that’s being delivered so that really wouldn’t serve very much
10:02
it’s just something that we all would have to understand as a fact so you’re comfortable with eating pesticides and herbicides no no no I’m talking about the labeling you were talking about labeling yeah okay why why do we have to label GMOs I also learned today that uh the labeling may or may not be a state thing it might be really a federal they were when they were trying to decide in the state they were talking about how the the FDA would be involved and so in other words there’s all kinds of reasons
10:37
I mean it’s immaterial because even at the federal level scientists testified before Congress and basically what they all agree on is that Americans are too stupid for GMO labeling I mean that’s basically the thesis of what they’re saying you think you’re stupid I don’t think they think they’re stupid that’s what the scientists say because here’s the thing the the GMO debate is not a scientific debate it’s largely a social phenomenon uh just like chanism I mean there are millions of
11:10
people in this world who believe that the Earth is 8,000 years old and I’m not kidding about that just cuz millions of people happen to have a view doesn’t mean that there’s like scientists are unsure about the age of the Earth no the Earth is billions of years old and scientists know this and not withstanding people who are uninformed and ignorant of the issue you’re expressing a lot of opinions how did you learn your stuff I started researching you know I I’m you know it’s really out of a character for
11:46
me to just jump on the bandwagon you know I don’t I think it was because my wife was pregnant and you know I wanted to eliminate any kind of you know Health you know risk I want I was trying to avoid any kind of risk at all you know even to the point where I wouldn’t let her use the laptop on her belly because I thought you know maybe that could cause some kind of damage or whatever so that’s really what got me started and then you know you always you surround yourself with like-minded people on
12:14
Facebook who also they share the same material same information so it’s like the propaganda is constantly being feeded to you on top of that there’s a there’s a cognitive bias that everyone has that’s called confirmation bias which means that you readily accept facts that confirm your view and you ignore things that are contradictory and this only helps to reinforce whatever view you have and it’s very common in politics so I think that’s how and also I had an emotional attachment I’m kind
12:48
of anti-corporation you know I’m anti-government so for me it was kind of like I I wanted to believe that GMOs are bad because that was consistent with my world view and then it the really the only thing that kind of galvanized me and forced me to start asking questions is when they started censoring me cuz in in my book censorship is a huge red flag you know anytime you censor somebody or try to silence them that just makes me more Curious you know that I now I okay now I really want to learn about it so
13:20
now I’m going to start actually doing research and when I did the research I was like oh my goodness you know I’ve I’ve been wrong this whole time well I hope all of you will do your uh own investigation what was that Sarah what was the name seralini seralini how do you check it out Dr sarini or c s e r a l i n a i i i n i I’m sorry sarini check it up anyway I know it’s it’s a big subject GMO and some people say it’s going to eliminate jobs and that leans them that way you for science it’s
13:56
immaterial uh whether it eliminates jobs or not because I don’t if GMOs were dangerous I wouldn’t care how many jobs it eliminated I’d like well get rid of them they’re dangerous uh but that’s not the case I mean science has a way of quickly rooting out BS you know somebody makes a claim and it’s an extraordinary claim like hey GMOs are causing cancer GMOs are causing tumors that requires extraordinary evidence you know you can expect people especially scientists to just believe that you know they’re going
14:30
to want to test it and make sure what you’re saying is legit and not just you know scare mongering uhhuh but they’re doing it we see the media all kinds of directions are making comments about everything well yeah I mean that’s that’s how this thing works I mean that’s how I got hooked into it is it’s scary you know GMOs it sounds like a Franken Franken fish and Franken tomato it’s scary and when you’re scared you’re not thinking you’re not reasoning you’re not being rational you’re you’re
15:01
just acting on impulse let’s pick another subject pick a subject marijuana should be legalized not decriminalized Hospital uh there should be no such thing as a certificate of need there should be nothing say that one more time there should be no such thing as a certificate of need what does that mean too so in order to build a hospital you have to get permission from the Govern government that says that you know the area needs a hospital that shouldn’t even be the case if you want to build a hospital
15:39
build a hospital with your own money not government funds of course if you have your own money and you want to build a hospital build it talking about West Maui situation that West Maui South Maui whatever you want you’re an entrepreneur I’m saying so that’s what you were specifically cuz you know when I said hospital I wasn’t specifically thinking about well that’s what killed the K hospital was a certificate of need they had to go to the government and say hey they had to like plead their case with
16:05
the government which is stupid if you have your own money and you want to build a hospital you should be able to build a hospital but here here’s what the certificate of need is about they’re worried that it’s going to take jobs from Maui Memorial you know like oh well we have these jobs here if we build a hospital there they’re going to take jobs and it’s going to reduce the service I don’t buy that argument you know that’s that’s economic protection ISM that’s them protecting jobs that
16:32
already exist and these people vote you know so they’re going to protect theirs at the expense of everyone else I mean it’s just like the Jones act are you familiar with the Jones act uh which one so the Jones Act was uh enacted early in the 19th century or or 20th century I’m sorry and uh basically it uh it reduces shipping in Hawaii it’s it’s a a federal law that says all um All Ships need to be built in America with an American captain primarily uh crewed by Americans with an American flag on it and the
17:09
effect of that is that it substantially reduces shipping because America doesn’t build ships anymore and the ships that we do build are five times more expensive than they are anywhere else in the world so what what happens is that it increases your cost of living and everybody’s by at least onethird you know everything uh is more expensive at least by oneir just due to the Jones act but the reason that the Jones act still exist is because a lot of people work for companies like Matson you know young
17:43
Brothers Horizon Lines these are well-paying union jobs and the unions uh of course they want to protect corporate profits they agree that the corporation should be protected their only disagreement is what should be done with the profits you know the unions want to go to the workers the corporations wanted to go to shareholders but they agree on corporate protectionism when I’m when we’re talking here I’m thinking clearly you have opinions and they’re outside the let’s say uh M
18:18
traditional okay certainly what are you hoping to do in the office I mean what do you hope you can do there cut government get government out of the way government creates problems um I don’t even know where to start let’s let’s look at homelessness for example you have a situation where 5% of the land here in Maui is zoned for commercial and residential 47% to conservation 48% to agriculture or switch those egg and uh conservation so quickly we see that there is not a shortage of land here in
18:54
Maui there’s the shortage of Zone land on top of that you have six layers of bureaucracy that you have to hop through before you can do any kind of development at all which is this process can take decades you know it can take a very long time to get through all the permits and the whole process so naturally you know economics tells us that there’s going to be a shortage of housing if you do that and so uh people don’t really have anywhere to go and the free market has come up with a solution they say oh well you
19:28
can’t afford a house on Mai well we have these things called mobile homes uh they’re very cheap and any basically anyone with a job can afford one but the government banned that solution the government says hey well we don’t want mobile homes here in Maui well if you don’t want to look at a mobile home you can look at a homeless guy in a shopping cart but don’t pretend like you’re you’re choosing between mobile homes and nothing you know there are Economic Consequences to every decision that the
19:56
government makes and they’ve decided that homelessness is more acceptable than mobile homes on top of that the free market has also come up with another solution they’re called 3D printers so now we have the technology where we can uh very uh quickly rapidly create and build very cheap and affordable homes using hemp creek which is a hemp made into concrete more or less the government’s banned hemp for stupid idiotic reasons too so now we can’t use that now they want to do a study for
20:32
they want to study whether or not uh we should grow hemp here in in Hawaii even though you can import any amount of hemp at all from any other country in the world that grows it right now I could get on the phone and order one ton of hemp and there’s no law that’s preventing me from doing that but I can’t grow it that’s stupid that’s government I see so you basically want to be in there to I don’t want to say dismantle but change the laws so that they’re less restricting well yeah I
21:06
mean look at the you know prohibition on marijuana can can anybody name one accomplishment of the marijuana prohibition has it done absolutely anything productive for our society can you even name one area where it has actually improved life I see okay and because I mean it creates jobs you know for police prison people politicians bureaucrats yeah it creates those kinds of jobs but at what expense you know everyone else suffers for for no reason it’s only increased use you know more people smoke weed now
21:42
than they otherwise would if if marijuana was legal so it’s stupid I mean that’s another example of government being stupid any other things that in that role there in the state senate that you feel you could help I guess reduce the I guess it’s reduce the hand isn’t that what it is reduce the hand that’s that’s affecting your life and of your family I mean I don’t even know where to start the the government is an obstacle towards uh Liberty in society I mean they’re an obstacle to progress so if
22:20
you have voters out there what would you say to them is why they should vote for you uh I mean you you should I really wish that you would go out there and start uh researching these issues for yourself and start to realize that government is the problem not the solution we always look towards the government to you know to save us from some whatever ill that you know they can conceive of terrorism communism drugs whatever it is start to look towards the government as being the source of the problem because really things start to
22:54
make sense when you see that you know or or I’ll give you a great example corporate ISM you know corporatism is the collusion between corporations and government most people want to say oh well it you know they they blame corporations which is only partially correct because if there were no favors to buy and sell in the first place there could be no corporatism so really you need to look at government as being the the main entity responsible for this mess yeah look at Obama he uh he constantly goes on TV talking about what
23:29
wealth inequality wealth inequality has skyrocketed under Obama I mean it’s ridiculous at this point his econ his economic policies favor Wall Street you know uh the QE and the printing press they print money it goes directly to financiers and bankers and it you know it’s supposed to trickle down but it never does so I mean I I don’t even I don’t know why people still believe in this myth that you know government represents the people or is is helping the little man versus the big man it’s
24:00
the opposite government is the 1% well thank you before we end I’d like to be able to give you a chance to kind of summarize if there’s anything that you make sure you’d like to tell the people out there Edward Snowden is an American hero what else okay well I’m really I’m leaving it up to you because I want to give you the chance to oh yeah I guess a little you know obviously when you’re when you’re umaku one of these things you only have a few minutes so I want to be able to
24:33
give you a chance to really get your message out that’s why I’m doing this you know okay um I’m basically completely anti-war I don’t support uh almost anything that the US government does overseas I mean Iraq Afghanistan Libya Somalia Yemen um they’re trying to get involved in Ukraine now Syria know I don’t I don’t support any of that and I don’t think you should either because it’s all based on lies they’re just lying to you they’re telling you that we have to be
25:07
here or else this is going to happen it’s all it’s all crap they’re lying and I served it in Afghanistan did you yeah still all hold to tell about it that’s a big deal congratulations on that you know um so now you all know who Bronson K who he is you know when we look look at the Slate there are so many people out there that don’t get a chance to be seen by you guys and uh if they have any questions and stuff there a way to yeah can can I say one more thing I would like you guys uh if you are anti-gmo
25:42
like I was I want you to start asking questions just start asking questions of Shaka start asking questions about everything just do your own research and ask questions and you will see what I’m talking about if they try to silence you or censor you or misdirect you here’s the thing uh because Monsanto lies and misleads the public their response to that is that we’re going to Mis lie and mislead the public in order to combat these lies and presentations doing that by Design you do yeah because if you go
26:19
to the I really don’t I I’m wondering only because I know the people individually and I don’t think I no no wait by okay when you say by Design are they aware of the fact that they’re wrong on the science no here’s the thing what a lot of people don’t realize is that the anti- GMO movement is being controlled by corporate interests okay organic groups and organic organic uh Farmers unions and stuff like that stand to make millions nationally billions if we ban GMOs so keep that in mind you
26:53
know if they can scare you into uh either Banning GMOs or not eating them or whatever they’re gonna make a lot of money I never did think and a lot of people aren’t aware of that you know I was upon in their little game too until I started asking questions and doing research and I just think myself I mean I’m just give you my opinion whatever the results would be I’d like to see the studies before I growing yeah American Medical Association the European Union commission the National Academy of
27:28
Science I mean where should I start every major uh scientific organization on this planet is in agreement and they’ve all done their own independent studies I mean yes 75% of all the studies are funded by biotech all right let’s be clear on that but what about the other 25% of studies what about the ones F the EU spent €2 200 million EUR studying the subject for 10 years for 10 years the government of the European Union spent 200 million Heroes to study whether or not GMOs are safe to eat and somehow
28:02
they came to the same conclusion as all the other scientists in the world so how could they come to the same how come there are companies that are that are uh Outlaw not companies countries where they won’t allow on Santa or the seed in well let let’s take the main one Russia so Russia has uh banned all GMOs Russia has also banned homosexuality are we to take from this that homosexuality is dangerous because Russia banned it I’m interesting how you well think about it of course I would not give that
28:37
answer think anyone would but your logic is saying oh well they Bann GMOs there must be something you know dangerous or or I’m just saying just like everyone was we’d Hope was doing the same kind of investigation that you are that’s what I’m thinking uh well I I really don’t think they uh they did a whole lot of research on homosexuality before they banned it and the same thing is probably true of GMOs uh it’s I think honestly Russia in particular the reason they uh probably banned it is because it’s an
29:11
American corporation and the money would go back to America you know if if they had their own GMOs I’m I’m sure they would you know be selling them but they don’t um as far as other countries you have uh well let’s go back to Europe you know uh Germany and France b a particular strain of corn I think it’s called like man 810 or something like that this was all based upon the study done by Dr seralini a a thoroughly discredited study like scientists around the world as soon as he publishes they pounced on
29:47
him like a pack of rabid wolves they’re like wait a minute what are you doing here I’m I’m glad that and it was based on his to give everyone a chance to really dig in and do their own research and yeah really evaluate what can I say one more thing about the uh Hawaii ban on GMOs in in Hawaii County all right so the that ban was based on the testimony of uh Jeffrey Smith and his qualifications are that he was a ballroom dancer and he believes that he can physically fly using yoga he has
30:22
zero scientific credentials he has he is not a scientist and yet he he was given 45 minutes to speak and it was based on his testimony that they banned GMOs this guy has he wrote he he did the documentary genetic rette I encourage everyone to go watch that when you’re done find out who uh Jeffrey Smith is he’s not a scientist he he has zero credentials zero qualifications to be speaking on this issue and yet he is given more time than actual scientists who flew in from uh monoa to say hey you know I’ve been I I
31:01
have a doctorate in this field I’ve been doing research for you know 10 years now wh why is this man given time to speak but we’re not that’s ridiculous it’s absolutely ridiculous the GMO debate is a social phenomenon it is not a scientific debate well you’re you’re definitely the most interesting candidate that I’ve seen you really basically sharing with me that you have strong opinions I’m not exactly understanding how in your role in the state senate you would be able to
31:37
apply these opinions to affect what you’re hoping to do well I mean I’d call out if there’s any Senator or any member of the public who who thinks that uh for example marijuana should be prohibited I’d call them out right there on the spot let’s set up a camera why do you think marijuana should be illegal now here are the facts and and uh you’re wrong you know you have not the marijuana prohibition has not accomplished absolutely anything so if the reason you support prohibition is
32:08
because you want to reduce marijuana use that logically doesn’t make any sense because prohibition does not reduce marijuana use so if you want to reduce marijuana use you should support legalization I hope that you guys are listening to this and digesting It Outside the Box think is something that all of us need to realize is the only way we can realize our freedoms you know there’s something that uh is represented here that I think all of you need to really look at personally and that is
32:45
your freedom to choose things that you want and uh Bronson here is talking about less restriction and sort of like going into I guess it’s not really the enemy camp it’s going into the system to try to change the system from within would you yeah sure I mean yeah you have a you have a lot of things that you’d like to change absolutely and whether or not you get to the seat or not I know that your strong voice is going to be a a good influence to people because it gets them thinking and whether you agree with them or not
33:26
you know we always talk about that I’d rather have someone who can think and is able to process and learn and understand if someone doesn’t agree with me it may not be as powerful as can I speak to them and actually have dialogued to help make something change and happen the thing is I swallowed the red pill a long time ago I’m a truth Seeker I don’t care where the truth takes me I’m going down the rabbit hole and I’m finding whatever I can find and so I have to get rid of
33:58
all my you know emotional cognitive biases what I want to believe you know I have to cast that aside and say you know actually I’m just going to go whatever the evidence says you know that’s where I’m going to go and for me it was like a kind of a a revelation almost you know I was like I was sitting at the computer one day I was like oh my goodness you know I’ve I was completely wrong about everything and it just hit me and I just kept digging kept digging and now I’m here to spread that message
34:29
there you go I hope that this was a great value to you and you enjoyed it and I hope that you can take it to the next step if if they have any questions and things you want them to email you or yeah uh bronah gmail.com
BronsonKaahui.com is my website check it out uh you know how to spell Kaahui Facebook I right Kaahui Bronson Kaahui.com that’s right great thank you for joining us hey thank you appreciate it take care everyone
